SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

S.K.SHARMA
Sheo Narains – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Shiv Kumar Sharma, J. - Instant petition has been filed by the petitioners for quashing and setting aside the First Information Report No. 10/1998 registered at the Police Station Fagi Distt. Jaipur on January 5, 1998, under Sections 209, 210, 420, 467, 468, 479, and 120B of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Brief resume of the facts is that complainant Smt. Chanduri instituted a complaint against the petitioner in the Court of Civil Judge (Junior Division) and Judicial Magistrate Dudu Distt. Jaipur on December 19, 1997. Learned Magistrate forwarded the said complaint under Section 156 (3), Cr. P.C. to the Police Station Fagi where FIR No. 10/ 1998 came to be registered against the petitioner. The accusation against the petitioners is that in order to grab the land they got two sale deeds registered in their names, therefore they got attested mutations and instituted a suit bearing No. 210/1993 in the Court of Assistant Collector, Dudu on June 30, 1993 which was decreed on July 8, 1993 and in pursuance of the decree of the Court, the petitioners became the khatedar tenant of the land. The petitioners having concealed the fact from the Revenue Court that the land belonged to a pers

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top