SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.A.MOHAMMED SHAFI
Nizar – Appellant
Versus
Hyrunneessa – Respondent


ORDER

K.A. Mohamed Shafi, J. - This Crl. M.C. is filed by the respondent in M.C. No. 3/1994 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court. Payyoli to quash Annexures-A and Borders passed by the trial court and the revisional court against the petitioner.

2. The M.C. was filed by the 1st respondent against the petitioner claiming amounts under S. 3 of the Muslim Women (Protection of Rights on Divorce) Act, 1986. The trial court after trial by order dated 18-5-1996 directed the petitioner to pay the 1st respondent Rs. 10.500/- being the value of the balance mahar of 31/2 sovereigns. Rs. 4500/- being the maintenance during the period of iddat Rs. 30,000/ - being the value of 10 sovereigns of gold ornaments. Rs. 50.000/- given to the petitioner by the father of the 1st respondent and Rs. 90.000/- by way of future maintenance. The petitioner assailed that order before the Sessions Court. Kozhikode in Crl. R.P. No. 44/96. The revisional court allowed the revision in part and confirmed the order passed by the trial court directing the petitioner to pay Rs. 4500/ - being maintenance during the period of Iddat. Rs. 50.000/-being the amount given to the petitioner by the father

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top