SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VISHNU SAHAI, RANJANA DESAI
Tulshiram Bhanudas Kambale – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Vishnu Sahai. J. - Since these three connected criminal appeals arise out of the same set of facts and a common impugned judgment, we are disposing them of by one judgment:

2. Through these criminal appeals, the appellants challenge the judgment and order dated 4th January, 1996, passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pandharpur in Sessions Case No. 44 of 1995, whereby they have been convicted and sentenced in the manner stated hereinafter:

(i)         All the appellants u/ss 452 r/w 149 I.P.C. to undergo 3 years R. I.

(ii) Appellants Tulsiram Kambale Ramchandra Kambale, Ganesh Shirsat, Ashok Waghmare, Dnyaneshwar Naikwadi, Anil Mane and Sunil Mane to undergo life imprisonment u/s 302 r/w 149 I.P.C. and

(iii) appellants Tulsiram Kamble Anil Mane and Rajendra Kothalkar' to undergo two years R.I. for the offence u/s 324 r/w 149 I.P.C.

The sentences of the appellants were ordered to run concurrently.

3. In short the prosecution case runs as under:

The appellants belong to the Koli community and are inter-related, Between them on one hand and the informant Rajabhau Kamble (P.W. 7). Dattatraya Kamble (P.W. 8), Bhaskar Bhinge (P.W. 11), his brother Pandurang Bhinge, Mahesh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top