SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1999 (3) Crimes 143
KERALA HIGH COURT
K.A. Mohammed Shaft,J.
Rosamma Thomas - Petitioner
versus
C.I. of Police - Respondent
Crl. M.C. No. 2277 of 1995
Decided on 9-2-1999
Counsel for the parties:
For the Petitioners: Mr. M.C. Nambiar, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. T.A. Shaji & Mr. V.V. Nandagopal. P.P.

IMPORTANT POINT
Status of Scheduled Tribes is conferred upon a person not on basis of religion he professes but on basis of a community to which he belongs and the region he is inhabiting.

Headnote:(i) Scheduled Castes Be Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 - Section 3(1)(x) - Petition to quash F.I.R. registered for offence - Petitioner with intent to insult and humiliate complainant who was a member of Scheduled Tribe abused him by calling him Scheduled Tribe name in public view - Contention that complainant was a Christian which faith did not recognise any caste and thus complainant did not come within ambit of Act - Status of Scheduled Tribes is conferred upon people not on basis of religion they profess but on basis of community they belong and region they are inhabiting - Notification by Govt. of Kerala that members of Scheduled Tribe even after conversion to some religion will continue to enjoy benefits admissible to Scheduled Tribes - Complainant though a Christian was a descendant of a member of a scheduled Tribe would, not be deprived of his status as member of Scheduled Tribe - F.I.R. was not liable to be quashed. (Paras 9 & 10)

       (ii) Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989- Section 3(1)(x) – Mere calling a person by his caste name Question whether such calling was with intent to insult victim within the public view is a matter to be decided after taking evidence and not in a petition u/s 482. Cr. P.C. (Para 12)

       Result: Petition dismissed.

       

ORDER

K.A. Mohammed Shaft, J. - This petition is filed by the accused in crime No. 39/95 registered' by Panangad police alleging offence punishable under Section 3 (1) (x) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 to quash the F.I.R. under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. The crime is registered against the petitioners on the basis of the complaint filed by the third respondent before the 'Circle Inspector of Police, Tripunithura and forwarded by him to the Sub Inspector of Police Panangad for appropriate action. The allegation made against the petitioners is that the petitioners who do not belong to the scheduled caste 'or Scheduled Tribe with intent to insult and humiliate the third respondent who is a member of Scheduled Tribe have abused him by calling him Scheduled Tribe name (Matter in other language) in public view and thereby they have committed the offence under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes & Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

3. The petitioner have filed this petition to quash the F.I.R. alleging that the third respondent does not belong to Scheduled Tribe and that no ingredients of the offence punishable under Section 3(1)(x) of the Act is alleged in the F.I. Statement and that mere calling the caste name or the tribal name will not constitute an offence punishable under Section 3(1)(x) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act.

4. The case of the third respondent is that he belongs to Mala Araya community, which is a Scheduled Tribe. The petitioners vehemently contented that the third respondent is a Christian which faith does not recognise any caste system. Therefore, the third respondent does not come within the ambit of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act. The third respondent contended that though the status of the members belonging to the Scheduled Castes is determined on the basis of their caste the status of the members of Scheduled Tribe is not determined on the basis of the caste or religion they profess, but by virtue of the tribe and the region they inhabit. Therefore, according to him the profession of faith or change of religion do not have any impact on the status of the members of Scheduled Tribes as in the case of the member of scheduled castes.

5. The fact that third respondent is a follower of christianity is not in dispute. Therefore, the petitioners contended that though the third respondent had enjoyed the status of Scheduled Tribe while he was professing Hindu religion by conversion into Christianity he lost that status and became a member of Christianity which does not recognise any caste system. In support of the contention that a person converted from Mala Araya Tribe into Christianity cannot be treated as a member of Schedule Caste or Scheduled Tribe, the petitioners relied upon the decision of a single Judge of this Court in Chandramohanan v. S.I. of Police1 wherein it has been observed as follows:

"Under Arts. 341 and 342 of the Constitution list of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes are published in relation to the State of Kerala. Going by the list, it is seen that "Mala Arayans" are treated as Scheduled Tribes. But Mala Arayans, who are converted into Christianity are not treated as members of the Scheduled Caste or Scheduled Tribe."

6. In that case the victim was a born Christian since their parents who originally belonged to Mala Arayan, community, which was considered to be a Scheduled Tribe in the State of Kerala embraced Christianity and she was born to them after they became Christians. So the learned Single Judge of this Court found that she can be treated only as a Christian by birth and as Christianity does not recognise any caste system or scheduled castes and scheduled tribes, they cannot be treated as members of the scheduled castes and scheduled tribes.

7. Apart from stating that Mala Arayans who converted into Christianity

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

SupremeToday

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top