SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.S.A.SIDDIQUI
Kavita – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


JUDGMENT

M.S.A. Siddiqui, J. - By this petition under Section 482. Cr. P.C. the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated 11-9-1995 passed by Mr. V.P. Kandpal, Metropolitan Magistrate. Delhi discharging the respondents No.2 to 5 of the offences charged under Sections 495/ 420/ 376/ 120 - B/511, I.P.C.

2. Briefly stated facts giving rise to this petition are that the petitioner lodged FIR No. 65/95 at the Police Station Gandhi Nagar. Delhi. Investigation pursuant to the said FIR culminated into submission of the charge - sheet under Sections 498 - A/ 406/ 376/ 420/ 495/ 120 - B/511. I.P.C. against the respondents No. 2 to 5. On submission of the charge -sheet the learned Metropolitan Magistrate launched on a process of satisfying himself that a prima facie case has been made out on the merits and passed a detailed order refusing to take cognizance of the offences under Sections 495/ 420/ 376/ 120 - B/511, I.P.C. against the respondents. Aggrieved by the said order the petitioner moved the Addl. Sessions Judge. Shahdara. Delhi by filing a revision petition which was rejected vide orders dated 6-9-1996 passed in Crl. (R) No. 5/96. Not satisfied with the dismissal of the revision,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top