SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

J.G.CHITRE
Akram – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


ORDER

J.G. Chitre, J. -The question to be adjudicated is whether the Magistrate trying the cases of petty nature should grant exemption to the accused who has been represented by an Advocate or Counsel and wants to get his case tried in accordance with provisions of law.

2. The prosecution case seems to be that petitioners were found carrying some school boys - seven in number in the bus when they were apprehended by the police who registered a crime against them for infringing the provisions of Section 66 of the Motor Vehicles Act. 1988 (hereinafter referred to as Act for convenience) Mr. Trivedi submitted that the petitioners want to contest the case only because they want to oblige those school going boys for enabling them to reach the school in time. Mr. Trivedi further submitted that the petitioners want to challenge the improper and arbitrary attitude of the police officials in such case who do not bother much for humanitarian spirit. Mr. Trivedi submitted that the offence is punishable with fine only which would extend to sum of Rs. 5,000/- with minimum fine of Rs. 2,000/-. He pointed out that the Court has been granted the discretion to punish the offenders with less amount

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top