SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.R.LAKSHMANAN, S.SANKARASUBBAN
Harihara Iyer – Appellant
Versus
State of Kerala – Respondent


JUDGMENT

A.R. Lakshmanan, J. - The complainant before the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court. Ernakulam in complaints med under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and Section 190 of the Code of Criminal Procedure alleging an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act against the accused is the petitioner in the Original Petition, which was filed:

(i) to declare that in respect of the complaints lodged under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, for taking cognizance, the examination of the complainant is not necessary under Section 200 of the Cr. P.C.;

(ii) to issue necessary instructions to all the Magistrates in the State of Kerala to take cognizance of the offences under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act by verifying the complaint and the documents produced by them and the examination of the complainants shall be insisted only if there is any discrepancy between them; and

(iii) to issue necessary instructions to all the Magistrates to give priority to the complaints lodged under Section 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, by the senior citizens and women."

The Writ petition was dismissed by Koshy, J. by judgment

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top