SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2001(3) Crimes 50 (SC)
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA
S. Saghir Ahmad & D.P. Wadhwa, JJ.
Mulukuri Siva Prasad —Petitioner
versus
State of Andhra Pradesh —Respondent
Crl. Appeal No. 68 of 2000
(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 1941 of 1999)
Decided on 11-1-2000

Headnote:Indian Penal Code, 1860—Section 324—Appellant convicted by trial Court under Section 307 IPC—Conviction altered to Section 324 IPC in appeal—High Court reduced sentence to two years imprisonment—Appeal—Complainant victim was mother of appellant—Compromise between parties—Complainant was now being maintained and treated well by petitioner—Application for compounding offence allowed and appellant acquitted. (Paras 4 & 5)

       Result : Appeal disposed of.

       

ORDER

Leave granted.

2. The appellant was convicted under Section 307 IPC and sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment by the trial court by its judgment dated 31.3.1994 for assaulting the complainant who is his real mother. The appellate court, however, by its judgment dated 9.6.1997 altered the conviction to Section 324 IPC and sentenced him to undergo three years rigorous imprisonment. The revision filed thereafter in the High Court was partly allowed and the sentence was reduced to two years. It is in these circumstances that the present appeal has been filed in this Court.

3. During the pendency of the appeal in this Court, an application for compounding the offence was filed on which we passed the following order on 30.8.1999.

“Both the complainant and the petitioner shall appear before the Asstt. Sessions Judge, Gudiwada (Andhra Pradesh). He shall verify the contents of the application for compounding of ­offence filed before this Court. A copy of the application shall be sent to Asstt. Sessions Judge, Gudiwada (AP). He shall find out whether the mother is living with the petitioner and the petitioner is looking after the complainant well or not.”

4. The Asstt. Sections Judge, Gudiwada, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh, has sent his report in which the compromise has been verified and it is specifically mentioned that the complainant who is the mother of the petitioner was being maintained and treated well by the petitioner. The report further indicates that the mother did not complain of any ill-treatment.

5. Having regard to the facts stated above, the application for compounding the offence is allowed. The appellant shall not be taken into custody as he shall be treated to have been acquitted. We, however, observe that he will have to continue to maintain his mother well throughout her life and serve her as an obedient son. The appeal is disposed of.

Appeal disposed of.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top