SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.T.THOMAS, S.N.VARIAVA
Mangilal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Judgment

S.N. Variava, J.—Leave granted.

2. Heard parties.

3. This appeal is against the judgment dated 5th July, 2000, by which the High Court has summarily dismissed the Revision Petition filed by the Appellant herein.

4. Briefly stated the facts are as follows:

The Appellant is the father of one Munki. The said Munki was married to the 2nd Respondent. Of the said marriage there is a girl child born to these two parties.

5. On 16th September, 1998, the Appellant filed a First Information Report with the Mahatma Gandhi Police Chauki, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. The complaint was to the effect that the 2nd Respondent used to beat his wife and harass her without any reasons. It was complained that even when the 2nd Respondent had been told not to beat his wife or harass her, he refused to listen to reasons. It was further complained that on 15th September, 1998, the Appellant was informed that Munki was seriously ill and had been admitted to Jodhpur Hospital. It was stated that when the Appellant went to the Hospital he found Munki in Emergency Ward. It was stated that Munki had informed the Appellant that she had been beaten and administered a glass of pesticide by her husband i.e. the 2n

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top