SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

VIKRAMADITYA PRASAD
Sunil Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties:
For the Petitioner:Mihir Jha & Manoj Tandon, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Shamim Akhtar, SC II & A.K. Mishra, JC to SC II.

ORDER

Vikramaditya Prasad, J. - This writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution has been filed for quashing the order dated 29.3.2001 passed by the learned Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jamtara, in G.R. Case No. 471/2000 arising out of Jamtara (Mihijam) P.S. Case No. 193/ 2000 (S.T. No. 348/200n, now pending in the court of Sessions Judge, Jamtara, whereby and whereunder the application filed by the petitioner under Section 167(2) Cr PC has been rejected.

2. Briefly stated, the petitioner is an accused in a case under Section 304B, 201/34, IPC. He surrendered in the Court below in the aforesaid case on 24.1.2001 and since then he is in jail. The charge-sheet in this case was filed on 21.4.2001 though his 60 days detention in jail had been completed on 26.3.2001. The petitioner had filed an application under Section 167(2). Cr PC for his release on bail on 27.3.2001. The matter was heard on 27.3.2001 and 28.3.2001 and on 29.3.2001 the application of the petitioner dated 27.3.2001 was rejected.

3. The main ground for rejection was that the petitioner was an accused under Section 304-B. IPC in which the prescribed punishment is imprisonment of not less than 7 years, but

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top