SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Mohan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties:
For the Appellants:Mr. Sandeep Mehta, Advocate.
Respondent: Mr. M.A. Bhurat, PP.

JUDGMENT

Sunil Kumar Garg. J.- These two appeals are being decided by this common judgment as both have been preferred against the common judgment and order dated 6-2-1999 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge No.2 Chittorgarh in Sessions Case No. 29/96 by which he acquitted the accused respondents Shanker Lal. Mangilal. Suresh Chandra and Nanuram for the offence under sections 366/149, 376/149, 379, 379/149 IPC and he also acquitted the accused appellants Mohan for the offence under sections 376/149, 379/149 and Udailal for the offence under sections 376 IPC. but convicted accused appellants Mohan for the offence under section 366 and udailal for the offence under sections 300 and 379 IPC and sentenced them in the following manner:

Name of accused appellants

Convicted

under section

Sentence awarded

1. Mohan

366 IPC

Three years' RI and to pay fine of Rs. 1000/-. In default of payment of fine. to further undergo SI for six months.

2. Udailal

366 IPC

Three years' RI and to pay fine of Rs. 1000/-, In default of payment of fine. to further undergo SI for six months.

379 IPC

One year RI and to pay fine of Rs. 500/-. In default of, of payment of fine to further undergo SI for two mo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top