SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Mohan – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Sunil Kumar Garg. J.- These two appeals are being decided by this common judgment as both have been preferred against the common judgment and order dated 6-2-1999 passed by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge No.2 Chittorgarh in Sessions Case No. 29/96 by which he acquitted the accused respondents Shanker Lal. Mangilal. Suresh Chandra and Nanuram for the offence under sections 366/149, 376/149, 379, 379/149 IPC and he also acquitted the accused appellants Mohan for the offence under sections 376/149, 379/149 and Udailal for the offence under sections 376 IPC. but convicted accused appellants Mohan for the offence under section 366 and udailal for the offence under sections 300 and 379 IPC and sentenced them in the following manner:
Name of accused appellants
Convicted
under section
Sentence awarded
1. Mohan
366 IPC
Three years' RI and to pay fine of Rs. 1000/-. In default of payment of fine. to further undergo SI for six months.
2. Udailal
366 IPC
Three years' RI and to pay fine of Rs. 1000/-, In default of payment of fine. to further undergo SI for six months.
379 IPC
One year RI and to pay fine of Rs. 500/-. In default of, of payment of fine to further undergo SI for two mo
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.