SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Bherulal – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties:
For the Petitioner Mr. D. Jasmatia, Advocate, Mr. B.S. Bhati, P.P.
For the Respondents:Mr. Devi Singh Bhati, Advocate.

ORDER

Sunil Kumar Garg. J.- This revision petition has been filed by the petitioner against the judgment dated 20-7-2000 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge Phalodi in criminal Revision No. 5/99 by which the learned Additional Sessions Judge set aside the order dated 9-8-1999 passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Phalodi by which the learned Judicial Magistrate discharged the accused petitioner and other accused respondents for offence under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B, I.P.C.

2. In this case. Mool Singh complain ant was not made a party by the accused petitioner but by order of this Court dated 23-3-2001, notice was issued to the complainant and on his behalf his counsel has given appearance.

3. The facts giving rise to this revision petition are as follows:

(1) Mool Singh complainant filed a complaint on 8-7-1992 in the Court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Phalodi against the present accused petitioner and some other accused persons stating that the accused petitioner Bheru Lal along with other accused persons made a conspiracy to swallow up the complainant's land and purchased Stamp paper in the name of Mool Singh (Complainant) an

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top