SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

M.R.HARIHARAN NAIR
Meera – Appellant
Versus
Mathew – Respondent


Counsel for the parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. K.P. Satheesan & K.K. Gopinathan Nair. Advocates.
For the Respondent: P.P. (T.K. Latif).

ORDER

M.R. Hariharan Nair, J. – The revision petitioner is a retired Taluk Supply Officer hailing from Taliparamba. He is aggrieved that through the impugned order passed in C.M.P. No. 7688 of 1997 the complaint filed by him against the first respondent in this case alleging offence under Section 500 of the IPC was dismissed under Section 203 of the Cr. P.C., inspite of the fact that he had examined three witnesses to prima facie establish the correctness of his averments.

2. In the complaint, the petitioner alleged that the accused, who is working as R.D.O., Thalassery, while participating in the meeting of the Food Advisory Committee held in the Collectorate Hall. Cannanore on 20-7-1996, made certain inputations aimed at the petitioner. The accused allegedly referred to certain irregularities in the performance of the Universal Gas Agency. The complainant alleged that after making a statement that a complaint directly filed against the irregularities in the Gas Agency did not yield any result and that the circumstances prevailing are such that the delinquent would escape and the complainant would suffer and that actually after getting huge amounts the gas cylinders were being ill

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top