SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

H.R.MALHOTRA, DALVEER BHANDARI
State – Appellant
Versus
Sant Kumar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties:
For the Appellant :Mr. Akshay Bipin, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate.

Judgment

Dalveer Bhandari, J.— By this judgment we propose to dispose of Criminal Appeal No. 179 of 1996 and Criminal Reference No. 1 of 1996. Both the appeal and reference arise out of the Sessions Case No. 21 of 1994, State v. Sant Kumar.

2. Brief facts necessary to dispose of the appeal and the reference are as follows.

3. According to the prosecution Inspector Ram Kishan, Incharge of Special Staff, New Delhi Range had a secret information that a gang of criminals hailing from Rajasthan was engaged in illegal trade of supplying opium in Delhi. On 28-4-1992 secret information was received that jeep No. RJP-5326 was scheduled to arrive at Upper Ridge Road, Delhi for trans-portation of opium. The further pro-secution story is that Inspector Ram Kishan informed his superiors about this information and requested R.K. Jha, Assistant Commissioner of Police (ACP) Headquarters, New Delhi District to join the raiding party. One public witness, Rattan Bahadur Chauhan, resident of Darshanpura, Gandhi Nagar was summoned in the office of Special Staff, New Delhi Range at Preet Vihar and was persuaded to join the raiding party by Inspector Ram Kishan. The raiding party consisting of Inspector

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top