M.KARPAGAVINAYAGAM, P.THANGAVEL
Oorkaval Perumal – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by Inspector of Police – Respondent
Judgment
M. Karpagavinayagam, J.— The appellants are A1 and A3 to A6 respectively along with A2, they were tried for the offences under sections 148 and 302 read with 149 I.P.C. The trial court acquitted A2 and convicted A1 and A3 to A6 for the offence under sections 148 and 302 read with 149 I.P.C. and sentenced them each to undergo R.I. for one year for the
offence under section 148 I.P.C. and life imprisonment for the offence under section 302 read with 149 I.P.C. Aggrieved by the same, this appeal has been filed.
2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows :
“(a) The deceased Santhanaraj, who belongs to Harijan community is the husband of papa (P.W. I). The accused 1 to 6 belong to Thevar comm-unity. There is an enmity between these two comm-unities. Both the community people conducted Pongal festival separately. Even in their independent festival, dispute arose between them. Consequently, on a complaint given by the person who belongs to Thevar comm-unity, a criminal case was filed against 13 persons be-longing to Harijan community in which the deceased San-thanaraj was one of the accu-sed. After the registration of the case, one Sudalaimuthu, the brother of the ap
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.