M.B.SHAH, B.N.AGARWAL, ARIJIT PASAYAT
Ram Narain Poply – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation – Respondent
Judgment
Shah, J. - The entire prosecution version is around the following five transactions entered into by Maruti Udyog Limited (hereinafter referred to as "MUL"), through United Commercial Bank (hereinafter referred to as 'UCO Bank') wherein Harshad S. Mehta A-5 is payee or recipient of the amount, which are mentioned hereunder:-
Trans. A-5 Dates Days Rate of Amount Interest Amount
No. From To % Rs. Rs. Repaid (Rs.)
01. Lent 24.01.91 25.02.91 32 12.75 4,99,45,000 5,58,250 05,03,250
to MUL
Remarks - MUL delivered 35 lacs Units of UTI to A5.
02. Borrowed 13.03.91 25.03.91 12 16.75 10,11,50,000 5,56,995 10,17,06,200
Remarks - UCO gave BR to MUL for 70 lacs Units.
03. Borrowed 18.03.91 22.03.91 5 21.00 10,83, 75,000 3,11,775 10,86,86,775
Remarks - UCO gave BR to MUL for 75 lacs Units.
04. Borrowed 24.04.91 26.04.91 2 26.25 7, 62,45,000 1,09,650 7,63,54,650
Remarks - UCO gave BR to MUL for 51 lacs Units.
05. Borrowed 02.05.91 07.05.91 5 25.00 10, 39,50,000 2,99,090 10,42,49,090
Remarks - Number of Units not known but only value stated in chargesheet.
Undisputedly, (a) the receipt and the paymen
State (Delhi Admn.) v. Laxman Kumar
Bhagwan Swarup Lal Bishan Lal etc. etc. v. State of Maharashtra
V.C. Shukla v. State (Delhi Admn.)
E.K. Chandrasenan v. State of Kerala
Kehar Singh & Ors. v. The State (Delhi Administration)
Yash Pal Mittal v. State of Punjab
Ajay Aggarwal v. Union of india
State of Maharashtra v. Som Nath Thapa
State of Kerala v. P. Sugathan & Anr.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.