G.P.MATHUR, S.RAJENDRA BABU
Union of India – Appellant
Versus
Prakash P. Hinduja – Respondent
Judgment
G.P. Mathur, J. - Union of India through Central Bureau of Investigation (for short "CBI") and Central Vigilance Commission (for short "CVC") have preferred these appeals by special leave against the judgment and order dated 10-6-2002 of a learned Single Judge of Delhi High Court by which the petition preferred by Prakash Hinduja respondent No.1 has been allowed and the cognizance taken by the learned Special Judge and all consequential proceedings have been quashed. It has, however, been left open to the prosecution to file a fresh charge-sheet after following the procedure laid down by this Court in Vineet Narain & Ors. v. Union of India 1998 (1) SCC 226.
2. In order to appreciate the controversy raised it is necessary to briefly notice the relevant facts. A contract was entered between Government of India and M/s. AB Bofors on 24-3-1986 for supply of 400 FH 77-B gun systems along with vehicles, ammunition and other accessories at a total cost of SEK 8,410,660,984 (equivalent to about Rs. 1437.72 crores as per exchange rate on 21.3.1986) and on 2-5-1986 advance payment equivalent to 20 per cent of the contract value was paid to M/s. AB Bofors. On 16-4-1987 Swedish Radio
Vineet Narain & Ors. v. Union of India
R.P. Kapoor v. State of Punjab
Delhi Municipality v. Ram Kishan
State of Haryana v. Bhajan Lal
State of U.P. v. Bhagwant Kishore Joshi
H.N. Rishbud & Inder Singh v. The State of Delhi
State of West Bengal v. S.N. Basak
Abhinandan Jha & Ors. v. Dinesh Mishra
State of Bihar & Anr. v. JAC Saldanha & Ors.
Supreme Court of Employees’ Welfare Association v. Union of India
State of J&K v. AR Zakki & Ors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.