PRAVENDU NARAYAN SINHA, AMIT TALUKDAR
Ashis Dey @ Bablu Dey – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
Judgment
Amit Talukdar, J.— Feeling aggrieved with his conviction recorded by learned Additional Sessions Judge in Sessions Trial No. 10 September of 1991 on 03-3-1994 in respect of the charge under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code and sentence of imprisonment for life accompanied by a fine of Rs. 5,000/- the appellant hereinabove has preferred this appeal purely on the ground of section 84 of the Indian Penal Code.
2. Shri Debasish Roy, learned counsel appearing in support of the appeal being assisted by Syed Shamsher Ali and Ranabir Roy Chowdhury has argued the appeal in great details. He has taken the pains to outline the entire evidence before us. He, in tune with the gravamen of the grounds restricted his submissions in respect of section 84 of the Indian Penal Code and submitted that the appellant squarely falls within the exception of the said provision and his conviction was liable to be set aside. Referring to the relevant witnesses Shri Roy submitted that the appellant was suffering from insanity before, during and after the incident and he was not in a position to comprehend his act; as such, the conviction, on the basis of a trial without resorting to the provision
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.