SUNIL KUMAR GARG
Ramji Ram – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
Judgment
Sunil Kumar Garg, J.— This appeal has been filed by the accused appellant against the judgment and order dated 4.6.1987 passed by the learned Session Judge, Merta in Sessions Case No. 41/83 by which he convicted the accused appellant for the offence under sections 316, 447 and 325 IPC in place of 307 IPC and sentenced him in the following manner:—
Name of accused Convicted Sentence awarded
appellant under Section
Ramjiram 316 IPC Four Year RI and to pay a fine of Rs. 500/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo six months RI.
325 IPC Two Years RI and to pay a fine of Rs. 300/-, in default of payment of fine, to further undergo three months RI.
447 IPC To pay a fine of Rs. 250/- in default of payment fine, to undergo one month imprisonment.
All the substantive sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
2. It may be stated here that by the same judgment and order, the learned sessions Judge acquitted the accused appellant and two accused persons, namely, Ruparam and Tejaram for the offence under sections 457,448 and 323 IPC and also acquitted the two accused persons Ruparam and Tejaram for the offence under sections 31
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.