SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2004 (4) Crimes 291
Delhi High Court
R.S. Sodhi, J.
Manmohan Singh —Petitioner
versus
CBI —Respondent
Crl.M.C. No. 1491 of 2004
Decided on 25-5-2004

Advocates:
Counsel for the parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. P.R. Thakur, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. H.J.S. Ahlu-walia, Advocate.

Headnote:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 — Section 439 — Bail — Condition directing accused-petitioner to deposit his pass-port with Court and not to leave country without prior permission — Petition to delete condition — Petitioner had been allowed to travel abroad on various occasions and had not belied the trust and had not caused any obstruction in trial nor had abused liberty — Condition modified in interest of justice. (Para 4)

       Result: Petition allowed.

       

ORDER

Crl. M.A. 4576/2004:

Allowed subject to just exceptions.

Crl. M.C. 1491/2002:

Notice. Mr. HJS Ahluwalia accepts notice.

This petition is directed against the order dated 17.8.1999 of the learned Special Judge whereby the learned Judge, while admitting the petitioner to bail, has directed him to deposit his passport with the Court. The learned Special Judge has further directed him not to leave the country without prior permission of the Court.

2. It is contended by Counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has travelled abroad with permission of the Court on as many as eight occasions and on each occasion the Court has desired of him to furnish a bank guarantee/FDR for a substantial amount. He also submits that the petitioner is frequently required to travel abroad on account of medical treatment and that again permission takes considerable time besides increasing workload.

3. Heard Counsel for the petitioner as also counsel for the CBI. Counsel for the CBI contends that he has no objection if the passport of the petitioner is returned but would insist on the petitioner submitting his itinerary to the Court before leaving the country and also keeping the Court informed of his contact address while abroad.

4. Having heard Counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of this case where the petitioner has been allowed to travel abroad on various occasions and has not belied the trust of the Court bestowed upon him; has neither caused any obstruction in the trial nor has he abused his liberty, in any manner, I deem it appropriate and in the interest of justice to modify the condition of bail that requires him to surrender his passport to the Court and not to leave the country without prior permission of the Court by deleting the same. I order accordingly. However, the petitioner shall now furnish a bail bond in the sum of Rs. 2,00,000/- (two lacs) with two sureties of Rs, 1,00,000/- (one lac) each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court. The petitioner shall, on leaving the country, furnish his itinerary and contact address to the Court on each occasion and shall inform the Court on his return. He shall ensure that his travels abroad do not, in any manner, interfere with the proceedings in the Court and no delay is occasioned on account of such travel.

5. With this Crl. M.C. 1491/2004 is disposed of. A copy of this order be given DASTI to Counsel for the petitioner.

Petition allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top