SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

K.G.BALAKRISHNAN, A.R.LAKSHMANAN
State of Madhay Pradesh – Appellant
Versus
Paltan Mallahetc. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties :
For the Appellants :Amrendra Sharan, Additional Solicitor General, Sushil Kumar, Sr. Advocate. A.D.N. Rao, A. Mariarputham, T.A. Khan, P. Parmeswaran, S. Murali­dhar, Ms Sudha Bhardwaj, Somiran Sharma, Amit Sharma, Advocates.
For the Respondents:Rajendra Singh, Surendra Singh, S.C. Dutta, K. Radhakrishanan, U.U. Lalit, Sr. Advocates, Karan Singh, Ashok Yadav, Narendra Kumar, B.L. Jain, Lalit Singh Chauhan, P.H. Parekh, Prashant Kumar, Rohan Thawani, Prasanjit Keswani, Nitin Sangra, Joseph Pookkett, Rana S. Biswas, M.P. Singh Chauhan, Shyam Dewani, Sanjay Sen, Anis Ahmed Khan, Ms. Kamakshi S. Mehlwal, Ms. Vasudha Sharma, Ms. Sarla Chandra, Prakash Srivastava, Ms. Anu Mohla, Pranab Kumar Mullick, Advocates.
For the State of Chhattisgarh :Ms. Suparna Srivastava and Rajesh Srivastava, Advocates.

Judgment

K.G. Balakrishnan, J.—Criminal Appeal Nos. 98-102 of 1999 and Criminal Appeal Nos. 109-114 of 1999 are filed by the State of Madhya Pradesh through CBI and the Criminal Appeal Nos. 103-108 of 1999 are filed by the Chattisgarh Mukti Morcha. All these appeals arise out of the common Judgment passed by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh on 26.6.1998. Nine accused persons were tried by the Second Addl. Sessions Judge, Durg, M.P. Accused Nos. 1 to 8 were charged for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 120B IPC. The 9th accused was charged under Section 302 read with Section 120B, and in the alternative, Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC and Section 25(1)(A) and Section 27 of the Arms Act. The Sessions Judge acquitted A-6 Naveen Shah, A-7 Chandrabaksh Singh and A-8 Baldev Singh Sandhu. A-1 Chandrakant Shah, A-2 Gyan Prakash Mishra, A-3 Avdesh Rai, A-4 Abhay Kumar Singh, A-5 Moolchand Shah and A-9 Paltan Mallah @ Ravi were convicted by the Sessions Judge for the offence under Section 302 read with Section 120-B. A-9 Paltan Mallah was found guilty of the offence punishable under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to capital punishment whereas other accused were sentenced t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top