SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

SATISH KUMAR MITTAL
Balkar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. A.P.S. Deol, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Gurpartap Singh Gill, AAG Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Satish Kumar Mittal, J.— Petitioner Balkar Singh has filed this revision petition challeng­ing the order dated 24.8.2004, passed by Addl. Sessions Judge, Mansa, dismissing the appli­cation filed by the petitioner for separating his trial from the other accused under Section 18 of the Juvenile Justice (Care & Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (hereinafter referred to as the Juvenile Justice Act), claiming himself to be a juvenile and for releasing him on bail un­der Section 12 of the Juvenile Justice Act.

2. In this case, FIR No. 113 dated 28.12.2002 was registered under Sections 308/365/34 IPC against the petitioner and his two brothers, namely Jagir Singh and Wazir Singh, three days after the alleged occurrence, on the statement of Pargat Singh, brother of the deceased. As per the version in the FIR, on 25.12.2002, the aforesaid three accused caused injuries to Bhola Singh, brother of the complainant, as they were suspecting that he was having illicit relations with their ‘Bhabi’. It is alleged that Balkar Singh petitioner gave a dang blow, which hit Bhola Singh on his right flank above the stomach. Bhola Singh remained under treatment in Civil Hospital, Mansa, from 27.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top