AMARESHWAR SAHAY
Madhusudan Rai alias Madhu – Appellant
Versus
State of Jharkhand – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Amareshwar Sahay, J.—This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 18-6-2000, in sessions Trial No. 601 of 2000, whereby the learned trial court convicted the appellant for committing the offences under Sections 498A and 304(B) of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced him to undergo R.I. for a period of 2 years under Section 498A and R.I. for a period of 7 years under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code. Both the sentences were directed to run concurrently.
2.The prosecution story, in short, is that the informant, namely, Shailesh Kumar Roy (P.W.6), the brother of the deceased Sandhya Roy lodged F.I.R. on 18-5-1996, alleging therein, that his sister, Sandhya Roy (deceased) was legally married to the appellant, Madhusudan Roy @ Madhu on 18-5-1996 and thereafter his sister started living in the house of the appellant, Madhusudan Roy @ Madhu. The appellant started demanding Rs. 45,000/- (Rupees Forty Five Thousand) from the informant and when he showed his inability, the appellant left his sister in his house. Then his sister did file case for maintenance against her husband, but the same was compromised, as the appellant gave assurance that he would keep his wife nicely
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.