SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

VINOD PRASAD
Shashi Kant Gupta – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttar Pradesh – Respondent


Counsel for the parties :
For the Applicant :V. Shandilya and S. Shandilya, Advocates.
For the Opposite Party : A.G.A.

ORDER

Vinod Prasad, J. — The present revision has been filed by the revisionist Shashi Kant Gupta against the impugned judgment and order dated 17.4.1985 passed by First Additional Sessions Judge, Jhansi in Shashi Kant Gupta v. State of U.P.1, under Section 7/16 Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, P.S. Garotha, district Jhansi. By the impugned judgment and order the lower Appellate Court had set aside the trial Court’s order and had remanded the case back for rehearing.

2.The factual matrix were that the sample of 450 grams of whole turmeric was taken by P.W.1, O.S. Sengar, Food Inspector from the shop of the revisionist on 29.9.1981 at 3.15 P.M. after giving notice in form-6 (Ex. Ka-1). The receipt of the purchase (Ex. Ka-2), inspection note (Ex. Ka-3) and Form No. 7 (Code slip) (Ex. Ka-4) were prepared by him and purchase receipt was got signed by the revisionist at the time of taking of sample. He sealed the sample into three philes, the code slip was pasted and one sample was dispatched for analysis to the Public Analyst. Other two samples were deposited with the local health authority/Chief Medical Officer, Jhansi. The public analysist vide its report dated 9.11.1981, Ex. Ka-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top