RAJEEV GUPTA, PRAFULLA C.PANT
Bhanumati – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent
ORDER
Prafulla C. Pant, J. — This appeal, preferred under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred as Cr.P.C.), is directed against the judgment and order dated 28.11.1988, passed in Sessions trial No. 210 of 1987, by the then, learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Nainital, whereby the appellant Bhanumati was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereinafter referred as I.P.C.) and has been sentenced to imprisonment for life.
2.Prosecution story in brief is that the complainant Tilak Ram (P.W. 1), father of the deceased, lodged the first information report (Ext. A-1) with police
station Kichcha on 27.07.1987 at 12:45 hours, alleging that his daughter Smt. Jasoda was married with Ash Narayan
S/o Baldeo R/o Inderpur, P.S. Kichcha, District Nainital. The accused/appellant Smt. Bhanumati is the mother of Ash Narayan and mother-in-law of the deceased. The behaviour of accused/appellant was not good with the deceased and she used to threaten her. She also used to turn out her daughter-in-law (deceased) from her house but some days before the occurrence there was a compromise and Smt. Jasoda (deceased) was sent by her parents to
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.