SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

P.G.AGARWAL
Jamuna Devi – Appellant
Versus
District and Sessions Judge, Tinsukia – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Petitioner: None appeared.
For the Respondents: P.P.

JUDGMENT

P.G. Agarwal, J. - The matter relates to taking of the suo motu revision against the order dated 17.6.2005 passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Tinsukia in Transfer Petition No.3/2005 whereby the Sessions Case No. 68(T)/02, which was pending in the court of the Additional Sessions Judge (FTC No.2), Tinsukia was withdrawn and transferred to the court of the Additional Sessions Judge (FTC) No.1), Tinsukia.

2. Srimati Jamuna Devi was the complainant in that Sessions trial and while the trial was proceeding before the learned Additional Sessions Judge (FTC) No.2), two accused persons namely, Gautam Bora and Prabin Tamuli filed the Misc. (Crl.) Transfer Petition No.3/2005 before the learned Sessions Judge, Tinsukia under section 408/409 Cr.P.C. for transfer of the said case from the trial court to any other court, wherein certain allegations were made against the trial court. The learned Sessions Judge, upon hearing both the sides, allowed the petition vide order dated 17.6.2005 and transferred the case as stated above, to the court of the learned Additional Sessions Judge (FTC No.1), Tinsukia.

3. The complainant/informant Smt. Jamuna Devi, thereafter, filed an application bef

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top