SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

T.VAIPHEI
Shiv Shankar Prasad Yadav – Appellant
Versus
Arya Samaj – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties :
For the Petitioner:Mr. A.H. Hazarika, Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. M.F. Qureshi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

T. Vaiphei, J. - The criminal petition under section 482 the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 has been filed by the petitioner to quash the criminal proceedings i.e. C.R. Case No. 560(S) 2006 under sections 468/465/420/419/418 pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Shillong.

2. I have heard Mr. A.H. Hazarika, the learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. M.F. Qureshi, the learned Counsel for the respondents.

3. The facts and circumstances leading to the filing of this criminal petition may be briefly noticed at the very outset. There is a registered society under the name and style of Arya Samaj, Shillong, which is stated to be the sponsoring body of two school namely, Arya Kanya Vidyalaya School, Laitumkhrah, Shillong and Arya Vidyalaya Secondary School, Jhalupara, Shillong. The case of the petitioner is that there is a dispute between the Arya Samaj and Vidyalaya, Shillong and Arya Samaj, G.S. Road, Shillong for the management of the Arya Vidyalaya Secondary School, Jhalupara, Shillong and he is the Secretary of the Arya Samaj Vidyalaya and is also functioning as the Headmaster of this school. The respondent Nos. 1 and 2 have filed the said criminal case

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top