Back
2008(1) Crimes 760 (Raj.)
RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT
Guman Singh, J.
Arun Kumar @ Neenu —Petitioner
versus
State —Non-petitioner
S.B. Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 7971 of 2007
Decided on 22.11.2007
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Shri Suresh Denwal, for Shri P. Balwada, Advocate.
For the State: Shri R.P. Kuldeep, P.P.
Headnote:Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 439—Bail—Petitioner was arrested regarding on incident of theft of mobile set from shop—Arrest was after three months of occurrence—One mobile set was recovered from his possession—Trial was likely to take quite some time —Fit case to release petitioner on bail. (Paras 2 and 4)
Result: Petition allowed.
ORDER
Guman Singh, J.—Heard learned counsel for petitioner, learned Public Prosecutor for the state and perused the relevant documents placed before me.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner argued that the theft pertains to a mobile set from the shop and the accused petitioner was arrested after three months of the occurrence and one mobile set of Nokia made, has been recovered from his possession. Challan has been filed. The trial is likely to take quite some time. Hence the benefit of bail should be given to him.
3. Learned PP opposed the bail application but conceded the fact situation.
4. In view of the submissions made at the bar and all other facts and circumstances of the case, it is a fit case to grant the benefit of bail to the accused petitioner.
5. In the result, this bail application u/s. 439 Cr.P.C. is allowed and it is directed that petitioner Arun Kumar @ Neenu S/o Shri Brij Kihor shall be released on bail in FIR No. 169/2007 P.S. Mundawar, District Alwar, on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 50,000/- together with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each, to the satisfaction of the concerned Court for his appearance before that Court on all dates of hearing and whenever called upon to do so.
Petition allowed.
********
