SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

J.P.SINGH
Mohd. Razak – Appellant
Versus
State of Jammu and Kashmir – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. K.S. Johal, Advocate.
For the Respondents: Mr. B.S. Salathia, AAG.

JUDGMENT

J.P. Singh, J.—Arrested on 9th of April, 2007 on being found to have accepted an amount of Rs. 1,000 as illegal gratification from complainant, Rattan Lal Koul, who had lodged a written complaint with Police Station Vigilance Organization, Jammu that Mohd. Razak, Patwari was demanding an amount of Rs. 1,000 as illegal gratification for entering Mutation of complainant’s wife, Daizy Koul regarding 9-1/2 marlas of land which she had purchased vide a duly executed and registered Sale deed, Mohd. Razak, Patwari and Kaki Ram, his peon have filed these two applications for their release on bail in FIR No. 09/2007.

2. Shri Bhupinder Singh Salathia, Learned Additional Advocate General submits that the petitioners were involved in a case of corruption punishable under Section 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act 2006, they, as such, may not be admitted to bail because their detention during trial would help curbing the menace of corruption in the society which according to Mr. Salathia had reached an alarming level. Learned Counsel additionally submits that the petitioners would tamper with the evidence which had been collected and which may be collected during further inve

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top