A.A.SAYED, R.M.S.KHANDEPARKAR
Saheb Sopan Kale – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
ORDER
R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J.—Heard. By the present application, the applicant is seeking to recall the sentence imposed on him in Criminal Appeal No. 888 of 2004 by the order dated 11th October 2004, on the ground that he was Juvenile in conflict with law, on the date of the offence, and therefore, considering the provisions of law, comprised under the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000, read with Juvenile Justice Act, 1986, he could not have been sentenced for life imprisonment or for death but should have been ordered to be produced before the Board, in terms of provisions of law for necessary order in terms of Section 15 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2000 (hereinafter called as the “Juvenile Act”).
2. Since the application was received through Jail and the applicant was not represented by the advocate, Miss. Rebecca Gonsalves advocate was appointed as amicus curie in the matter. We have heard the learned advocate as well as the learned APP for the respondent in the matter. We have also perused the records including those of Criminal Appeal No. 888 of 2004.
3. It is sought to be contended that since the applicant was bor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.