SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

M.CHOCKALINGAM, S.PALANIVELU
Velraj – Appellant
Versus
State rep. by the Inspector of Police – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellants in Crl. A. (MD) No. 461 of 2007:Mr. Gopalakrishna Lakshmana Raju, Senior Advocate.
For the Appellants in Crl. A. (MD) No. 535 of 2007:Mr. V. Kathirvelu, Advocate.
For the Respondents (for both appeals): Mr. N. Senthurpandiyan, Additional Public Prosecutors.

Velraj VS State rep. by the Inspector of Police
Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top