SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

H.N.SARMA
Amsar Ali Paramanik – Appellant
Versus
State of Assam – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:Mr. A.S. Choudhury, Sr. Advocate.
For the Respondents:Mr. Z. Kamar, PP, Assam, Mr. Z.H. Saikia Advocate.

JUDGMENT AND ORDER (ORAL)

H.N. Sarma, J.— Inherent jurisdiction of the Court under Section 482, Cr PC is sought to be exercised by filing this petition by the accused/petitioner challenging the order dated 1.7.2008 in CR Case No.940c/08 (Corresponding to Kokrajhar PS Case No.213/08) and GR No.598/08 registered under Section 376/498(A)/109/420/403/ 406/506/511/34.

2. I have heard Mr. A.S. Choudhury, learned senior counsel for the accused/petitioner and Mr. Kamar, learned PP, Assam and Mr. J.H. Saikia, learned counsel appearing for the complainant/respondent No.2.

3. The broad facts leading to filing this petition are undisputed and are as follows:

4. The complainant is the wife of the petitioner No.2 and their marriage took place on 12.2.2008 by executing a Kabinnama under the Muslim Law fixing Dower money of Rs.30,000/-. However, after the marriage, her marital life did not pass happily. The accused No.2/husband of the complainant was raised by the petitioner No.2 in his house like his younger brother. After marriage, it is alleged that the accused No.2 who is given status of father by accused No.1 committed sexual harassment upon the complainant under threat. Being unable to bear

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top