SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.GOPAL REDDY, G.V.SEETHAPATHY
Suntru Somi Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of A. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. E. Venkat Reddy, Advocate.

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

G.V. Seethapathy, J.—This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 16.5.2006 in S.C. No. 35 of 2005 on the file of Principal Sessions Judge, East Godavary, Rajahmundry, wherein the appellant was found guilty for the offence under Section 302 IPC and was convicted for the same and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life and to pay a fine of Rs.100, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for one month.

2. The case of the prosecution in brief is as follows:

3. The accused is a resident of Ramannavalasa and the deceased Pallala Kannamreddy is a resident of Bodigagondi village. The accused is close relative of the deceased being the nephew of the mother of the deceased. About one year prior to the occurrence, the accused developed illicit intimacy with the mother of the deceased and it was known to one and all. The accused used to visit the house of the deceased now and then to meet the mother of the deceased. About one month prior to the occurrence, the mother of the decease left Bodigagondi village along with the accused and shifted to Ramannavalasa. About one week prior to the incident, the father of the deceased went Ramannavalasa and convinced his wife and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top