SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

H.IMTIYAZ HUSSAIN
Chaman Lal Bindro – Appellant
Versus
State of J&K – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. P.N. Raina, Advocate.
For the Respondent:Mr. Sunil Sethi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

H. Imtiyaz Hussain, J.—This criminal revision is directed against the order dated 12.12.2007 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sopore in a police challan—State through Chaman Lal, FIR No. 424/2004 under Sections 447, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B RPC.

Brief facts relevant for the disposal of the present petition are as under:

On 10.12.2004 one Chaman Lal filed a written complaint duly endorsed by the Additional Superintendent of Police, Sopore in police station, Sopore alleging therein that his land measuring 6 kanals and 1 marlas situated at Sopore colony opposite R&B Complex comprising Khasra No. 970/33 belongs to him and that some construction work is being raised in the said land without seeking any authority or permission from him. The complainant further informed the police that he has not sold the said land nor has he executed any legal document in respect of the said land in favour of any person.

3. On this report FIR No. 424/2004 under Section 447RPC was registered in police station, Sopore and the investigation was started. During the investigation it was found that Syed Mohd Farid was raising construction on the land. Said Syed Mohd Farid produced a power of attor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top