SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2009(2) Crimes 662 (Ori.)
ORISSA HIGH COURT
B.K. Patel, J.
Nurbanu Bibi –Petitioner
versus
State of Orissa –Opposite Party
Bail Application No.17484 of 2008
Decided on 8-1-2009

Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Aparesh Bhoi, Advocate.
For the Opposite Party: State.

Headnote:Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985—Section 21 & 37—Criminal Procedure Code, 1973—Section 439—Bail application—22.060 grams of heroin recovered from accused—However only 5.2% of Diacetylmorphine was found in one gram of sample and thereby total Diacetylmorphine in entire quantity recovered came to 1.15 grams—Petitioner deserved to be released on bail. (Paras 3 & 4)

       Result: Petition allowed.

       

ORDER

B.K. Patel, J.—Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. In this application under Section 439 Cr.P.C. the petitioner has renewed her prayer to be released on bail in Special Case No.46 of 2007 of the Court of learned Special Judge-cum-Sessions Judge, Balasore arising out of Balasore Town P.S. Case No.529(4) of 2007. The petitioner stands charge-sheeted for commission of offence under Section 21 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

3. Earlier application for bail preferred by the petitioner in BLAPL No.4017 of 2008 was rejected upon reference to conditions contained under Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act. Referring to chemical examination report, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that sample quantity weighing one gram out of the allegedly seized total quantity of 22.060 grams contraband was found to contain Diacetylmorphine i.e. Heroin and the strength of the same was found to be 5.2% only. On the basis of such submission it was argued that at the worst the petitioner may be accused to be in possession of approximately 1.15 grams of Diacetylmorphine which is much below prescribed commercial quantity. As per the notification 5 grams of Diacetylmorphine i.e. Heroin amounts to small quantity. It was contended that in view of the chemical examination report, the bar contained under Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act is not attracted while dealing with the petitioner’s bail application. It was further submitted that the petitioner is an elderly woman who is languishing in jail for more than a year. Investigation having already been completed there is no scope for tampering with evidence. Also there is no apprehension from any quarters that the petitioner may abscond, if released on bail nor it is alleged that the petitioner is involved in any case of similar nature.

4. Having heard from both sides, the submission made on behalf of the petitioner regarding non-applicability of provision under Section 37 of the N.D.P.S. Act does not appear to be unfounded. Therefore, taking into account the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case as well as period of under trial detention already undergone by the petitioner, who is a woman, it is found just to admit her to bail. Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner shall be released on bail by the learned Special Judge-cum-Sessions Judge, Balasore in connection with the aforesaid case on such terms and conditions as the learned Special Judge-cum-Sessions Judge deems just and proper.

5. The BLAPL is accordingly disposed of.

Urgent certified copy of this order be granted on proper application.

Petition allowed.

*******

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top