SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DEO NARAYAN THANVI
State of Rajasthan – Appellant
Versus
Gani Mohd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: Mr. Mahipal Bishnoi, Public Prosecutor.
For the Respondent:Mr. B.N. Kalla, Advocate.

ORDER

Deo Narayan Thanvi, J.—This Misc. Petition arises out of the reference made by the learned ACJM, Badi Sadri, District Chittorgarh on 28.1.05 with regard to seeking direction under Section 318 of the Criminal Procedure Code, in short “the Code”, in Cr. Regular Case No:503/98 “State v. Gani Mohd,” with regard to the judgment & order of sentence passed on 5.2.2001 & 7.2.2001 respectively.

2. Heard learned Public Prosecutor as well as learned counsel appearing for the accused Gani Mohd.

3. Upon perusal of the record of the case and the judgment, it appears that the learned Magistrate has made a reference under Section 318 of the Code on the order of sentence dated 7.2.01 after pronouncement of judgment on 5.2.01. Under Section 318 of the Code, if the accused, though not of unsound mind, cannot be made to understand the proceedings, the Court may proceed with the inquiry or trial and in the case of a Court other than a High Court, if such proceedings result in a conviction, the proceedings shall be forwarded to the High Court with a report of the circumstances of the case and the High Court shall pass thereon such order, as it thinks fit. According to this Section, it applies when

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top