SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

B.K.PATEL
Annapurna Agency – Appellant
Versus
State of Orissa – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners:M/s. I.C. Dash, B.D. Das, D. Nanda and D.T. Kharmate, Advocates.
For the Opposite Party: Mr. K.K. Mishra, Additional Standing Counsel.

JUDGMENT

B.K. Patel, J.— In both the applications under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 (for short ‘the Cr, P.C.’) the petitioners have made prayer to quash the order dated 13.6.2002 passed by the learned S.D.J,M., Bhawanipatna taking cognizance of offence punishable under Section 16(1)(a)(i) Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 (for short, ‘the Act’) as well as the criminal proceeding in 2(c) C.C. No.18 of 2002 now pending in the file of learned J.M.F.C. Bhawanipatna.

2. The criminal proceeding was initiated against the petitioners and another upon receipt of prosecution report submitted by the Food Inspector, Kalahandi. It appears that the Food Inspector inspected the Wholesale Agency of co-accused Prakash Jain who figures as accused No.1. On verification the Food Inspector suspected Everest brand ‘Turmeric Powder’, ‘Chilly Powder’, and ‘Sabji Masala’ manufactured by the petitioner in CRLMC No.796 of 2004 who figures as accused No.3 and supplied to the accused no.1 by the petitioner in CRLMC No.255 of 2004 who figures as accused no.2 to be adulterated. He made statutory purchase of packages of each of the items in packed condition and sent sample package of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top