SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.L.JHANWAR
Daulal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Shri H.S. Patel, Advocate.
For the State/Respondent: Shri Satish Gupta, G.A.

JUDGMENT

Rajeshwar Lal Jhanwar, J.—This appeal is directed against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 29.9.1994 delivered in Sessions Case No.274/1993 by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur whereby the appellant was convicted under Section 456 and 376 read with Section 511 of the I.P.C. and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for one year under Section 456 and to rigorous imprisonment for five years under Section 376/511 of the I.P.C. respectively with a direction to run both the sentence concurrently.

2. Prosecution story in brief is that on 7.3.1993 at about in the night the prosecutrix Ku. Sarojini Bai PW5 accompanied with her nephew, aged two years was sleeping inside her room. Mother of the prosecutrix was sleeping in Purchi and her brother and his wife were sleeping in another room. The appellant came from back door, entered insie her room and lifted the petticoat of the prosecutrix and thereafter attempted to commit rape on her. The prosecutrix upon feeling pain awoke and started shouting. After hearing her outcry, mother, brother came to her and on this the appellant fled from the spot the prosecutrix narrated the story to her mother, brother and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top