SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

P.B.MAJMUDAR, R.G.KETKAR
Abdul Aziz Lokhandwala – Appellant
Versus
Nasir Ali – Respondent


JUDGMENT (ORAL)

P.B. Majmudar, J.—Since the common law points are involved in all these petitions, all these petitions are taken up for hearing together. The petitioners in each of these petitions are facing trial under section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the N.I. Act’).

2. So far as Criminal Writ Petition No. 3152 of 2009 is concerned, a Division Bench of this Court by its order dated 2nd December, 2009 directed the Registry to club this petition along with Writ Petition Nos. 1544 of 2009 and 1545 of 2009, as the point involved in the said petition is the same and that is how all these writ petitions are placed for hearing together. On behalf of the petitioners it is submitted that the provisions of Section 145 of the N.I. Act are ultra vires the provisions of Article 21 of the Constitution of India and the said Section is required to be struck down.

3. As pointed out earlier, the petitioners are facing trial under section 138 of the N.I. Act. According to the petitioners, at the time of trial, in lieu of the examination in chief, the original complainants have tendered their affidavits which contain various leading questions. The peti

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top