SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

V.K.JAIN
State (Delhi Administration) – Appellant
Versus
Shiv Shankar – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioners: Jaideep Malik, PP.
For the Respondent:M.L. Alwadhi, Advocate.

JUDGMENT

V.K. Jain, J.— This is an appeal filed by the State against the Judgment dated 2nd April, 2004, whereby the respondent was acquitted of the charge under Section 16 of Prevention of Food and Adulteration Act, 1954.

2. On 31st December, 1992, Food Inspector Surender Kumar Sharma purchased, for analysis, a sample of paneer, a food article, from the respondent who was running business under the name and style of M/s Kumar Dairy, 6/33 Moti Nagar, New Delhi. Paneer was found stored in the shop of the respondent for the purpose of sale. The case of the complainant is that the sample of paneer purchased by the Food Inspector, weighing about 750 gms., was cut into small pieces with the help of clean and dry knife in a clean and dry aluminum tray and was mixed with the help of clean and dry steel spoons. The sample was then divided into three equal parts each of which was kept in a separate clean and dry bottle and 20 drops of formalin was added to each bottle. After packing, fastening, marking and sealing the sample as per PFA Act & Rules, signatures of the respondent were obtained on the paper slip and wrapper of the bottle. One counterpart of the sample was sent to Public Analysi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top