SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

MAHESH CHANDRA SHARMA
Meer Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent


Advocates:
Council for the parties.
For the appellant:Mr. Rinesh Gupta, Advocate.
For the Respondent: Mr. Peeyush Kumar, Public prosecutor.

JUDGMENT

Mahesh Chandra Sharma, J.—The appellant Meer Singh filed this appeal against .the judgment dated 20.9.2003 of Special Judge, Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act Cases, Jhunjhunu whereby he has been convicted and sentenced under Section 8/15 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 to undergo 10 years’ RI and pay a fine of Rs.1.00 lakh and in default of payment of fine to further undergo Two years’ RI.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 30.6.1999 at about 8.30 p.m. Prem Prakash Chauhan, Circle Officer, Chirawa lodged a written report at Police Station Surajgarh Distt, Jhunjhunu alleging that on 30.6.1999 at about 12.30 noon Vinod Kumar Sharma, Commercial Taxes Officer Jhunjhunu during checking at Pipli Check Post on Loharu Pilani Road intercepted Truck No. RJ 18 P 0656 on which he was shown Bilty of Salt and Bill which were prepared for Kuchaman City to Khairthal for Haryana. On suspicion, the driver of the Truck was asked to get the loaded goods of the truck checked. On cursory check by the staff it was suspected that there were other goods, than declared. Thereupon the loaded truck was detained for physical verification. During the inte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top