SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

T.P.SHARMA
Divyaram – Appellant
Versus
State of Chhattisgarh – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. V.G. Tamaskar, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 1/State: Mr. Qamrul Aziz, Panel Lawyer.

ORDER

T.P. Sharma J.— This petition under Section 482 of the Cr.P.C. is for quashment of the order dated 31.8.2001 passed by the Second Additional Sessions Judge (F.T.C.), Jashpur Nagar, in Sessions Trial No.48/2001 whereby & whereunder learned Second Additional Sessions Judge has acquitted respondents Nos. 2 to 4 of the charge of Sections 307 & 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Quashment is prayed on the ground that the Court below has not considered the evidence adduced on behalf of the prosecution sufficient for conviction of respondents No. 2 to 4 for the offence punishable under Sections 307 & 307/34 of the Indian Penal Code and thereby committed illegality.

3. Brief facts necessary for disposal of this petition is that the present petitioner along with other persons went to village Bipatpur for urad crop which he has sown in the field. Respondents Nos. 2 to 4 came there and assaulted the petitioner and other persons and caused grievous injuries. They have attempted to commit murder of the petitioner. Report was lodged and after completion of investigation charge-sheet was filed. Charges were framed upon respondents No. 2 to 4 and after providing opportunity of hearing to th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top