AMAR SARAN
Tara – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Amar Saran, J.— Heard Shri P.N. Mishra and Sri Jitendra Pal Singh, learned counsel for the revisionists, Shri M.C. Gupta for opposite party No.2 and learned Additional Government Advocate.
This criminal revision has been filed against an order dated 14.09.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, FTC No.4, Mathura in ST No. 87 of 2009, summoning the revisionists under sections 147, 323/149, 307/149, 452 and 506 IPC in exercise of powers under section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
The revisionists were summoned after the evidence of the informant PW1 Smt. Shyamwati and one of the injured PW2 Sahab Singh which disclosed that on the date of incident the revisionists and the other co-accused had assaulted the injured with various weapons at about 3.00 p.m. Prior to this after the police had submitted a final report, a protest petition was filed by the complainant, Shyamwati, and then after following the procedure of a complaint case the 6 co-accused other than the revisionists were summoned on 10.03.2008, but no order was passed summoning the revisionists.
2. No contention was raised on merit by the learned counsel for the revisionists. Only one submission was mad
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.