SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

AMAR SARAN
Tara – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. Jitendra Pal Singh, Mr. P.N. Misra, Advocates.
For the Opp. Parties: Mr. M.C. Gupta, AGA.

JUDGMENT

Amar Saran, J.— Heard Shri P.N. Mishra and Sri Jitendra Pal Singh, learned counsel for the revisionists, Shri M.C. Gupta for opposite party No.2 and learned Additional Government Advocate.

This criminal revision has been filed against an order dated 14.09.2009 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, FTC No.4, Mathura in ST No. 87 of 2009, summoning the revisionists under sections 147, 323/149, 307/149, 452 and 506 IPC in exercise of powers under section 319 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

The revisionists were summoned after the evidence of the informant PW1 Smt. Shyamwati and one of the injured PW2 Sahab Singh which disclosed that on the date of incident the revisionists and the other co-accused had assaulted the injured with various weapons at about 3.00 p.m. Prior to this after the police had submitted a final report, a protest petition was filed by the complainant, Shyamwati, and then after following the procedure of a complaint case the 6 co-accused other than the revisionists were summoned on 10.03.2008, but no order was passed summoning the revisionists.

2. No contention was raised on merit by the learned counsel for the revisionists. Only one submission was mad

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top