SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

A.S.OKA
Archana Hemant Naik – Appellant
Versus
Urmilaben I. Naik – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Ms. Anjali Helekar, Advocate.
For the Respondent No. 1:C.M. Kothari, Advocate.

ORDER

A.S. Oka, J.— The revision applicant is an applicant in an application under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act). In the said application, the applicant had impleaded six opponents. The first opponent Hemant is the husband of the applicant. The applicant married to said Hemant on 9th May 1986. The second opponent in the said application is the brother-in-law of the revision applicant. The fourth opponent is the wife of the second opponent. The third opponent is the mother-in-law of the revision applicant. The third opponent in the said application has been impleaded as the first respondent in this revision application. The fifth opponent in the said application under Section 12 of the said Act is the sister-in-law of the revision applicant. The sixth opponent in the application is the husband of the fifth opponent.

2. According to the case made out by the revision applicant, she was residing along with her husband and her in-laws in the house by the name Jagan Villa at Nani-Daman. According to the case of the revision applicant; on 22nd June 2004 in the afternoon, she was assaulted and thrown out of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top