JUDGMENT

1. By both these criminal applications, the applicants-accused No.1 to 4, have prayed for quashing of the FIR at CR No. 158/2009 registered on the complaint of respondent No.3. As both these applications arise out of one crime, they are being disposed of by this common judgment.

2. Rule.

3. Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, heard finally at the stage of admission itself.

4. Brief facts of the case may be stated thus

a) Respondent No.3 is the second wife and applicant Abeda is the first wife of applicant Ramzan Shaikh. Applicants Shaheen and Imran are daughter in law and son of applicants Ramzan and Abeda.

b) Respondent No.3, has filed a complaint in MIDC CIDCO police station on 06.12.2009 for an offence punishable u/s 307 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code against all the accused. Pursuant to the said complaint, the applicants were arrested and subsequently are released on bail.

5. By these applications u/s 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, the applicants have approached this Court for quashing of the FIR. It appears that during the pendency of these applications, charge sheet has been filed before JMFC, Aurangabad on 29.05.2010 and numbered as RC