JUDGMENT

U.D. Salvi, J.—This application has been moved for special leave to appeal against the judgment and order dated 5.11.2009 passed by the CJM, Panaji acquitting the surviving accused /respondent No.2 Arun @ Neelam—widow of the deceased accused/respondent No.1 R.K. Sharma, of the offence punishable under Section 406, 420, IPC, 1860 in criminal case No.232/2001/A.

2. Learned Advocate N. Sardessai for the appellant/complainant submitted that the Trial Court completely missed the point and proceeded to acquit the accused on the facts not germane to the case. He further submitted that the accusations were also made against the surviving accused in terms as appearing in the complaint. According to him, the complainant had cordial relations over a decade and half with the surviving accused and her deceased husband, then Inspector General of Police, State of Goa, and somewhere in the year 1991, the deceased accused requested the complainant to get the necessary plans approved from the various competent authorities for construction of a bungalow on the plot of land allotted to him in Sainik Co-operative Housing Building Society Ltd, Alto-Porvorim, Bardez, Goa and eventually the comp