SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

R.B.MISRA, V.K.SHARMA
State of H. P. – Appellant
Versus
Deen Mohammad – Respondent


Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant: Mr. Anil Jaswal, Dy. AG.
For the Respondent:Mr. Anup Chitkara with Mr. Chaman Negi, Advocates.

JUDGMENT (ORAL)

R.B. Misra, J.—The present criminal appeal has come up for consideration after the leave to appeal has been granted under Section 378(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, in reference to judgment dated 22nd, December, 1993, passed by learned Sessions Judge, Chamba Division, at Chamba, in Sessions Case No.12 of 1996, thereby acquitting the respondent/accused for offence under Section 20 of the Narcotic Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (for short ‘the Act’) –

2. In order to adjudicate the present criminal appeal, it is necessary to give the factual background of the prosecution case. The facts, as per the prosecution story, are that on 29.12.1991, PW-8, Bidhi Chand, the then SHO Police Station, Dalhousie was present at Tunnuhatti barrier on patrolling, along with PW-9, ASI Om Parkash, other-police officials and PW7, Kashmir Singh, when at about 4 a.m. accused came from the side of Nanikhad and tried to slip away on seeing the police. He was apprehended on suspicion and notice Ext. PE was issued to him as to whether he wanted to give his search before a Magistrate or Gazetted Officer and the accused gave in writing on Ext. PC that he is ready to give search b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top