SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

R.M.SAVANT
Ann Menezes – Appellant
Versus
Shahajan Mohd. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Petitioner:Mr. A.D. Bhobe, Advocate.
For the Respondent: None.

JUDGMENT

R.M. Savant, J.—The above petition takes exception to the Order dated 9.6.2008, passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge-3, South Goa, Margao, by which Order, the Appeal filed by the respondent herein came to be allowed and the Order dated 5.11.2007, passed by the learned JMFC, insofar as directing/ordering the respondent herein to secure an alternate accommodation to the petitioner and granting Rs. 10,000 towards loss of earnings, was quashed and set aside. However, the rest of the reliefs granted by the learned JMFC were maintained.

2. The facts in brief can be stated thus:

The petitioner, herein, and the respondent were married in the year 1995. The petitioner converted herself to Islam. The registration of the marriage was done on 22.6.1994. Out of the said marriage, a boy child was born on 6.12.1994. After marriage, the petitioner and the respondent firstly stayed at Bogda, then in the MPT colony in the accommodation of the petitioner’s father. Till 1996, the relations between the petitioner and the respondent were normal. However, thereafter, the respondent subjected the petitioner to domestic violence. It is alleged by the petitioner against the respondent th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top