SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

D.R.AZAD
Kanhaiya Lal – Appellant
Versus
State of U. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Revisionist:Mr. N.D. Shukla, Advocate.
For the Opp. Parties: Mr. Rahul, AGA.

JUDGMENT

D.R. Azad, J.—The present criminal revision has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 18.12.2005 passed by the Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate 11 Kanpur Nagar in Criminal Complaint Case No. 7228 of 2005 (M/s M.R. Traders through proprietor Nand Kumar Bhatia v. M/s Kanhaiya Lal & Sons through its proprietor Kanhiya Lal under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, Police Station Collectorganj, District Kanpur Nagar, whereby process has been issued against the revisionists to fetch the prosecution.

2. The brief facts of the case is that the Opp. Party No.2 supplied goods to the revisionists for a sum of Rs. 1,18,809.20 through bill No.15701 dated 04.03.2005 in respect of which revisionists assured to pay the entire amount through cheque. Revisionists issued a cheque No.506252 dated 12.05.2005 of ICICI Bank Ltd. for a sum of Rs. 1,18,809.20.

The said cheque has been dishonoured due to insufficient of funds. Opp.Party No.2 thereafter on 22.08.2005 filed a criminal complaint being case No.7228 of 2005 against the revisionists in the court of Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate-II Kanpur Nagar under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act. The learned

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top