SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

JITENDRA CHAUHAN
Nahar Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Punjab – Respondent


Advocates:
Counsel for the Parties:
For the Appellant:Mr. J.S. Chahal, Advocate
For the Respondent: Mr. J.S. Bhullar, AAG, Punjab.

JUDGMENT

Jitendra Chauhan, J.—The present criminal appeal has been preferred by the appellant challenging the judgment/order dated 25.2.2000, passed by the learned Special Judge F’ategarh Sahib (hereinafter referred to as “Trial Court”), thereby convicting the accused appellant for committing offence punishable under Sections 7and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) and sentencing him to undergo imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000 for the offence under Section 7 of the Act and in default of payment of fine, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. The accused-appellant was also sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of two years and to pay a fine of Rs.2,000 for the offence under Section 13d(2) of the Act and in default thereof, to further undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months. Both the sentences were ordered to run concurrently.

2. The brief facts of the case, as set up by the prosecution in para 2 of the judgment of learned Trial Court, are that:

“Mukhtiar Singh son of Banta Singh, resident of village Badla Kotla was joint in cultivation with his father and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top